<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 71 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59007</link>
    <description>Relief under section 80V depended on a borrowing being connected with payment of tax arrears. On the facts, the link was not proved for the earlier instalments because no material showed that the LIC loan was obtained specifically for those payments, so relief was denied for that part. The record did support the claim for tax payments made after receipt of the loan, so relief was allowed to that limited extent and the disallowance was set aside accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 71 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59007</link>
      <description>Relief under section 80V depended on a borrowing being connected with payment of tax arrears. On the facts, the link was not proved for the earlier instalments because no material showed that the LIC loan was obtained specifically for those payments, so relief was denied for that part. The record did support the claim for tax payments made after receipt of the loan, so relief was allowed to that limited extent and the disallowance was set aside accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>