<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58989</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing rectifying defects in appeal memoranda and considering explanations for delays. The judgment highlighted the principle of relation back in correcting defects and stressed the need for diligence in appeal submissions. The ITAT reversed the AAC&#039;s decision, restoring the appeal for merit-based disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:22:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58989</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing rectifying defects in appeal memoranda and considering explanations for delays. The judgment highlighted the principle of relation back in correcting defects and stressed the need for diligence in appeal submissions. The ITAT reversed the AAC&#039;s decision, restoring the appeal for merit-based disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>