<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 68 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58960</link>
    <description>A deduction for back-wage liability was denied because no accrued liability arose in the year, the amount was treated in the accounts as a reserve, and the Industrial Disputes Act did not itself create the immediate payment obligation claimed. Director&#039;s commission and related perquisites were brought within the section 40(c) disallowance framework and the disallowance was upheld. For business expenses, entertainment and death-anniversary outgoings were disallowed, authorised-capital filing fees were treated as capital expenditure, accommodation expenses were hit by the guest-house restriction, while club membership fee and factory pooja expenses were allowed as business expenditure and staff welfare. Interest under sections 139(8), 215 and 217 was held not independently appealable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 68 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58960</link>
      <description>A deduction for back-wage liability was denied because no accrued liability arose in the year, the amount was treated in the accounts as a reserve, and the Industrial Disputes Act did not itself create the immediate payment obligation claimed. Director&#039;s commission and related perquisites were brought within the section 40(c) disallowance framework and the disallowance was upheld. For business expenses, entertainment and death-anniversary outgoings were disallowed, authorised-capital filing fees were treated as capital expenditure, accommodation expenses were hit by the guest-house restriction, while club membership fee and factory pooja expenses were allowed as business expenditure and staff welfare. Interest under sections 139(8), 215 and 217 was held not independently appealable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>