<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58959</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed under sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(c) for concealment of income and failure to furnish an estimate of advance tax for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81 were upheld. The Tribunal found that the revised returns were not voluntary disclosures under the Amnesty Scheme but were filed to avoid litigation, justifying the penalties. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58959</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed under sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(c) for concealment of income and failure to furnish an estimate of advance tax for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81 were upheld. The Tribunal found that the revised returns were not voluntary disclosures under the Amnesty Scheme but were filed to avoid litigation, justifying the penalties. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>