<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessee was eligible for the deduction under section 35 of the Income-tax Act for laboratory equipment and building expenditure intended for scientific research. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in upholding the rejection by the Income Tax Officer, and the deduction was granted for the additional expenditure. The assessee succeeded in obtaining the deduction that had been previously denied by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessee was eligible for the deduction under section 35 of the Income-tax Act for laboratory equipment and building expenditure intended for scientific research. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in upholding the rejection by the Income Tax Officer, and the deduction was granted for the additional expenditure. The assessee succeeded in obtaining the deduction that had been previously denied by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>