<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the deduction under section 80T for long-term capital gains should be calculated based on the long-term capital gain before setting off any losses. The Tribunal emphasized that when two interpretations are possible, the one favoring the taxpayer should be preferred. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the assessee was entitled to succeed in the dispute over the calculation of the deduction under section 80T for long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the deduction under section 80T for long-term capital gains should be calculated based on the long-term capital gain before setting off any losses. The Tribunal emphasized that when two interpretations are possible, the one favoring the taxpayer should be preferred. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the assessee was entitled to succeed in the dispute over the calculation of the deduction under section 80T for long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>