<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58929</link>
    <description>The majority view held that the assessee was entitled to depreciation on two foreign-made cars as they were used in the business of running them on hire for tourists, including both Indian and foreign tourists. The appeal was allowed, quashing the order of the CIT and restoring the ITO&#039;s decision to allow the depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58929</link>
      <description>The majority view held that the assessee was entitled to depreciation on two foreign-made cars as they were used in the business of running them on hire for tourists, including both Indian and foreign tourists. The appeal was allowed, quashing the order of the CIT and restoring the ITO&#039;s decision to allow the depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>