<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 71 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58863</link>
    <description>Profits earned by an acquired undertaking before vesting in a Government company remained taxable in the hands of the notified company. The statutory scheme allowed vesting in a Government company where the section 9(1) notification so directed, and section 9(3) applied the provisions relating to profits and liabilities as if references to the Central Government were references to that company. On that construction, the pre-vesting profits and the corresponding tax liability travelled with the undertaking to the assessee, and the amount could not be treated as an exempt capital receipt merely because it was routed through the Government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:25:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 71 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58863</link>
      <description>Profits earned by an acquired undertaking before vesting in a Government company remained taxable in the hands of the notified company. The statutory scheme allowed vesting in a Government company where the section 9(1) notification so directed, and section 9(3) applied the provisions relating to profits and liabilities as if references to the Central Government were references to that company. On that construction, the pre-vesting profits and the corresponding tax liability travelled with the undertaking to the assessee, and the amount could not be treated as an exempt capital receipt merely because it was routed through the Government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>