<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 94 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to include Rs. 1,02,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanations inconsistent and lacking reliable evidence, deeming the firm&#039;s certificate unreliable. The Tribunal concluded that the high denomination notes were not part of the firm&#039;s cash, and the assessee failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 94 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to include Rs. 1,02,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanations inconsistent and lacking reliable evidence, deeming the firm&#039;s certificate unreliable. The Tribunal concluded that the high denomination notes were not part of the firm&#039;s cash, and the assessee failed to provide convincing evidence to the contrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>