<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 116 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the current AAC&#039;s decision that the assessment had been canceled by the ITO&#039;s reopening, rendering the appeal infructuous. The Tribunal determined that the actions of the previous and current AAC were justified, with the current AAC&#039;s decision being administrative and not warranting legal intervention. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no legal grounds to interfere with the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 116 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the current AAC&#039;s decision that the assessment had been canceled by the ITO&#039;s reopening, rendering the appeal infructuous. The Tribunal determined that the actions of the previous and current AAC were justified, with the current AAC&#039;s decision being administrative and not warranting legal intervention. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no legal grounds to interfere with the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>