<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order under section 216 of the Income-tax Act was not time-barred and within the permissible time frame for levy of interest. It clarified that the order under section 216 is separate from the assessment and the absence of mention of interest in the assessment order does not waive the ITO&#039;s discretion to decide on interest independently. The Tribunal restored the ITO&#039;s order as no submissions were made challenging the levy, allowing the departmental appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order under section 216 of the Income-tax Act was not time-barred and within the permissible time frame for levy of interest. It clarified that the order under section 216 is separate from the assessment and the absence of mention of interest in the assessment order does not waive the ITO&#039;s discretion to decide on interest independently. The Tribunal restored the ITO&#039;s order as no submissions were made challenging the levy, allowing the departmental appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>