https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58825 The Tribunal rectified its original order to allow legal expenses as revenue expenditure following the Bombay High Court's decision. The rectification was made under section 254(2) to correct the apparent mistake, aligning with the High Court's ruling and emphasizing its binding nature. The issue was deemed non-debatable post the High Court's decision, leading to the rectification and partial allowance of the appeal. en-us Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:24:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58825 The Tribunal rectified its original order to allow legal expenses as revenue expenditure following the Bombay High Court's decision. The rectification was made under section 254(2) to correct the apparent mistake, aligning with the High Court's ruling and emphasizing its binding nature. The issue was deemed non-debatable post the High Court's decision, leading to the rectification and partial allowance of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58825