<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the amounts received by the society were considered part of its income. The receipts were deemed revenue in nature, arising from a consistent source under a contractual agreement with members, rather than being casual or capital receipts. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the receipts mirrored those in the members&#039; possession, emphasizing that the society&#039;s receipts stemmed from a distinct source outlined in its regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT BOMBAY-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that the amounts received by the society were considered part of its income. The receipts were deemed revenue in nature, arising from a consistent source under a contractual agreement with members, rather than being casual or capital receipts. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the receipts mirrored those in the members&#039; possession, emphasizing that the society&#039;s receipts stemmed from a distinct source outlined in its regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>