<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 111 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58809</link>
    <description>Additions based only on statements recorded during a search were not sustainable where the statements were later retracted as involuntary and no corroborative material was found. The partners stated that the admissions were made under pressure, and the search yielded no incriminating documents, loose papers, or other independent evidence of undisclosed income. In such circumstances, a retracted statement recorded during a prolonged search cannot, by itself, justify additions. The Tribunal therefore deleted the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 111 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58809</link>
      <description>Additions based only on statements recorded during a search were not sustainable where the statements were later retracted as involuntary and no corroborative material was found. The partners stated that the admissions were made under pressure, and the search yielded no incriminating documents, loose papers, or other independent evidence of undisclosed income. In such circumstances, a retracted statement recorded during a prolonged search cannot, by itself, justify additions. The Tribunal therefore deleted the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>