<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58793</link>
    <description>Employee-director remuneration was treated as governed by the director-specific restriction under section 40(c) rather than section 40A(5), while the value of chauffeur-driven car perquisites was required to be computed under the prescribed Income-tax Rules. Weighted deduction under section 35B was allowed only to the extent the foreign travel expenditure fell within the eligible export-promotion category. Expenditure on development work, repairs, replacements and cable re-routing was characterised as revenue because it merely restored efficiency and did not create an enduring capital asset. The hotel business was regarded as set up once licences, registrations and initial operations showed readiness to commence business, supporting depreciation claims. The remaining development expenditure was allowed as part of the earlier accepted claim, and interest relief under sections 139, 215 and 216 followed consequentially, while investment allowance required fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:08:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58793</link>
      <description>Employee-director remuneration was treated as governed by the director-specific restriction under section 40(c) rather than section 40A(5), while the value of chauffeur-driven car perquisites was required to be computed under the prescribed Income-tax Rules. Weighted deduction under section 35B was allowed only to the extent the foreign travel expenditure fell within the eligible export-promotion category. Expenditure on development work, repairs, replacements and cable re-routing was characterised as revenue because it merely restored efficiency and did not create an enduring capital asset. The hotel business was regarded as set up once licences, registrations and initial operations showed readiness to commence business, supporting depreciation claims. The remaining development expenditure was allowed as part of the earlier accepted claim, and interest relief under sections 139, 215 and 216 followed consequentially, while investment allowance required fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>