<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58769</link>
    <description>The appellate court partially allowed the appeal filed by the Department, modifying the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to eliminate the income of Rs. 641 initially assessed by the Income Tax Officer. The court upheld the Department&#039;s argument that provisions resulting in a loss under the head of &#039;house property&#039; should be disregarded, emphasizing the interpretation of &#039;income&#039; within the statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58769</link>
      <description>The appellate court partially allowed the appeal filed by the Department, modifying the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order to eliminate the income of Rs. 641 initially assessed by the Income Tax Officer. The court upheld the Department&#039;s argument that provisions resulting in a loss under the head of &#039;house property&#039; should be disregarded, emphasizing the interpretation of &#039;income&#039; within the statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>