<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58765</link>
    <description>A penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was treated as a debt owed on the relevant valuation dates for wealth-tax purposes. The Wealth-tax Act deducts all debts owed on the valuation date unless specifically excluded, and the penalty order gave rise to a statutory liability when imposed. That liability was not changed by the assessee&#039;s appeal, the stay of recovery on furnishing security, or non-payment of the amount. The later appellate confirmation supported the position that the liability had already existed before the valuation dates. The article states that a disputed statutory liability is not merely contingent because it is under challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 105 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58765</link>
      <description>A penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was treated as a debt owed on the relevant valuation dates for wealth-tax purposes. The Wealth-tax Act deducts all debts owed on the valuation date unless specifically excluded, and the penalty order gave rise to a statutory liability when imposed. That liability was not changed by the assessee&#039;s appeal, the stay of recovery on furnishing security, or non-payment of the amount. The later appellate confirmation supported the position that the liability had already existed before the valuation dates. The article states that a disputed statutory liability is not merely contingent because it is under challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>