<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Departmental appeal, modifying the order of the CIT(A), setting aside the assessment order, and directing the ITO to pass a fresh order according to law after complying with all legal requirements, including those of Section 144B. The Tribunal emphasized that non-compliance with mandatory procedural provisions results in an irregularity that can be cured, rather than rendering the proceedings null and void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Departmental appeal, modifying the order of the CIT(A), setting aside the assessment order, and directing the ITO to pass a fresh order according to law after complying with all legal requirements, including those of Section 144B. The Tribunal emphasized that non-compliance with mandatory procedural provisions results in an irregularity that can be cured, rather than rendering the proceedings null and void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>