https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the delay in filing the appeal was satisfactorily explained, leading to the reversal of the CIT(A)'s decision. The Tribunal found that the directors of the assessee-company were not aware of the earlier service of the demand notice, and therefore, the delay in filing the appeal was justified. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the admission of the appeal and instructed for a disposal on merits after providing reasonable opportunities for all parties to be heard. en-us Wed, 01 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:43:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58742 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the delay in filing the appeal was satisfactorily explained, leading to the reversal of the CIT(A)'s decision. The Tribunal found that the directors of the assessee-company were not aware of the earlier service of the demand notice, and therefore, the delay in filing the appeal was justified. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the admission of the appeal and instructed for a disposal on merits after providing reasonable opportunities for all parties to be heard. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58742