<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58723</link>
    <description>Advertisement expenditure was accepted as business expenditure where the disputed items were treated as presentation articles and publicity-related outgoings incidental to the assessee&#039;s trading business. The nature and volume of the spending, viewed against total turnover, supported the claim, and the small disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 107 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58723</link>
      <description>Advertisement expenditure was accepted as business expenditure where the disputed items were treated as presentation articles and publicity-related outgoings incidental to the assessee&#039;s trading business. The nature and volume of the spending, viewed against total turnover, supported the claim, and the small disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>