<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58704</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding satisfactory explanations for the disputed cash deposits in the capital account for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted for the respective years, except for the Rs. 3,000 addition in the assessment year 1971-72, which was upheld. As a result, the appeal for the assessment year 1971-72 was partially allowed, while the appeal for 1972-73 was fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58704</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding satisfactory explanations for the disputed cash deposits in the capital account for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted for the respective years, except for the Rs. 3,000 addition in the assessment year 1971-72, which was upheld. As a result, the appeal for the assessment year 1971-72 was partially allowed, while the appeal for 1972-73 was fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>