<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed various claims made by the assessee, such as advertisement expenditure in souvenirs, depreciation on capital expenditure for scientific research, expenditure on shareholders&#039; visit to the factory, shortage in inventories, motor car expenses, guest house expenses, stock exchange listing fees, development rebate on nylon plant, coal handling contract penalties, brokerage, inflation of purchases, legal charges, loss on purchase of shares, interest on superannuation fund, reimbursement of medical expenses, and commission paid to another corporation. The Tribunal considered factors like commercial expediency, business advantages, and adherence to legal principles in allowing these claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:02:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed various claims made by the assessee, such as advertisement expenditure in souvenirs, depreciation on capital expenditure for scientific research, expenditure on shareholders&#039; visit to the factory, shortage in inventories, motor car expenses, guest house expenses, stock exchange listing fees, development rebate on nylon plant, coal handling contract penalties, brokerage, inflation of purchases, legal charges, loss on purchase of shares, interest on superannuation fund, reimbursement of medical expenses, and commission paid to another corporation. The Tribunal considered factors like commercial expediency, business advantages, and adherence to legal principles in allowing these claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>