https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58693 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It reversed the AAC's decision to include interest income from the firm Bankimchandra & Co. in the assessee's total income, restoring the ITO's order. The Tribunal upheld that the share of the assessee-minor from the firm should be included in the parent's total income with the higher income. Additionally, it supported the deletion of the Rs. 20,000 unexplained investment but remanded the Rs. 28,480 addition back to the AAC for further review. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:57:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58693 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It reversed the AAC's decision to include interest income from the firm Bankimchandra & Co. in the assessee's total income, restoring the ITO's order. The Tribunal upheld that the share of the assessee-minor from the firm should be included in the parent's total income with the higher income. Additionally, it supported the deletion of the Rs. 20,000 unexplained investment but remanded the Rs. 28,480 addition back to the AAC for further review. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 02 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58693