<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 72 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58690</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction only for the proportion of qualifying expenditure corresponding to the percentage of diamonds exported as a small-scale exporter. The judgment clarified the restrictive nature of the provisions under section 35B(1A) during the relevant period and highlighted the specific conditions that needed to be met for claiming weighted deduction as a small-scale exporter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 72 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58690</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the department&#039;s appeal, ruling that the assessee was entitled to weighted deduction only for the proportion of qualifying expenditure corresponding to the percentage of diamonds exported as a small-scale exporter. The judgment clarified the restrictive nature of the provisions under section 35B(1A) during the relevant period and highlighted the specific conditions that needed to be met for claiming weighted deduction as a small-scale exporter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>