<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 97 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58659</link>
    <description>Liabilities incurred for purchasing an exempt residential flat remained deductible in computing the principal value of the estate because section 44 of the Estate Duty Act allows all deceased liabilities unless specifically barred. The flat&#039;s exemption under section 33(1)(n) did not prevent deduction of the related purchase liability, as that liability was a separate item and had not already been deducted from the flat&#039;s value. Reliance on section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act was rejected because a sister statute cannot impose an additional restriction not found in the principal Act. The liability was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 97 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58659</link>
      <description>Liabilities incurred for purchasing an exempt residential flat remained deductible in computing the principal value of the estate because section 44 of the Estate Duty Act allows all deceased liabilities unless specifically barred. The flat&#039;s exemption under section 33(1)(n) did not prevent deduction of the related purchase liability, as that liability was a separate item and had not already been deducted from the flat&#039;s value. Reliance on section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act was rejected because a sister statute cannot impose an additional restriction not found in the principal Act. The liability was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>