<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 88 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58647</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority regarding the exclusion of repairs and insurance expenses on a motor car for aggregation under section 37(3A) based on a prior High Court ruling. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 35(2A) for a donation to a charitable trust for a scientific research program, emphasizing a broader interpretation of &quot;scientific research&quot; and concluding that recognition under section 35(1)(ii) at the time of donation was not a prerequisite for claiming the deduction under section 35(2A). The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 88 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58647</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision of the first appellate authority regarding the exclusion of repairs and insurance expenses on a motor car for aggregation under section 37(3A) based on a prior High Court ruling. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 35(2A) for a donation to a charitable trust for a scientific research program, emphasizing a broader interpretation of &quot;scientific research&quot; and concluding that recognition under section 35(1)(ii) at the time of donation was not a prerequisite for claiming the deduction under section 35(2A). The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>