<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58632</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-C ruled in favor of the respondent public charitable trust in an appeal against the revenue regarding exemption under section 11 of the IT Act. The Tribunal determined that the amount in question, received as residual income from another trust, did not constitute an impermissible investment under section 11(5). By analyzing the concept of &quot;investment&quot; and distinguishing it from a donation, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the exemption benefits, overturning the Income Tax Officer&#039;s decision and affirming the CIT(Appeals) order. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:46:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 88 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58632</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT BOMBAY-C ruled in favor of the respondent public charitable trust in an appeal against the revenue regarding exemption under section 11 of the IT Act. The Tribunal determined that the amount in question, received as residual income from another trust, did not constitute an impermissible investment under section 11(5). By analyzing the concept of &quot;investment&quot; and distinguishing it from a donation, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the exemption benefits, overturning the Income Tax Officer&#039;s decision and affirming the CIT(Appeals) order. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>