<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to cancel the penalty under section 140A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1984-85. The assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment of self-assessment tax, due to assets seized and retained by the department, was considered valid. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, acknowledging the impracticality of meeting the tax liability when the seized assets were inaccessible to the assessee. The exemption under section 249(4) for the remaining tax due on self-assessment was granted, allowing the potential sale of seized assets to settle the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 95 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to cancel the penalty under section 140A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1984-85. The assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for non-payment of self-assessment tax, due to assets seized and retained by the department, was considered valid. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, acknowledging the impracticality of meeting the tax liability when the seized assets were inaccessible to the assessee. The exemption under section 249(4) for the remaining tax due on self-assessment was granted, allowing the potential sale of seized assets to settle the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>