<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 145 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against the levy of interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act was not maintainable as it was not a denial of liability but a challenge to the circumstances leading to the levy. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the deletion of interest by the CIT(A) was not justified, reinstating the interest of Rs. 7,33,346. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 145 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against the levy of interest under Section 215 of the Income-tax Act was not maintainable as it was not a denial of liability but a challenge to the circumstances leading to the levy. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the deletion of interest by the CIT(A) was not justified, reinstating the interest of Rs. 7,33,346. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>