<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 156 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58600</link>
    <description>Domicile of choice is acquired only by residence in a place together with a present intention to make it a permanent home; mere employment-related residence abroad is insufficient to displace the domicile of origin. On the stated facts, the deceased studied and worked in the United States, obtained a green card, applied for US citizenship, and showed an intention to settle there permanently, so later transfers and periodic visits to India did not undo that change. Applying the Indian Succession Act and the estate duty scheme, the deceased was treated as domiciled in the United States, and the foreign assets were not taxable in India on the footing advanced by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 156 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58600</link>
      <description>Domicile of choice is acquired only by residence in a place together with a present intention to make it a permanent home; mere employment-related residence abroad is insufficient to displace the domicile of origin. On the stated facts, the deceased studied and worked in the United States, obtained a green card, applied for US citizenship, and showed an intention to settle there permanently, so later transfers and periodic visits to India did not undo that change. Applying the Indian Succession Act and the estate duty scheme, the deceased was treated as domiciled in the United States, and the foreign assets were not taxable in India on the footing advanced by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>