<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 151 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the assessee was not entitled to a full refund of Rs. 1,15,967. The tax liability on the returned income remained valid despite the assessment cancellation, with only the excess demand raised by the I.T.O. being considered without legal authority. The decision was grounded in the interpretation of the charging section, the Income-tax Act&#039;s scheme, and pertinent judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 151 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the assessee was not entitled to a full refund of Rs. 1,15,967. The tax liability on the returned income remained valid despite the assessment cancellation, with only the excess demand raised by the I.T.O. being considered without legal authority. The decision was grounded in the interpretation of the charging section, the Income-tax Act&#039;s scheme, and pertinent judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>