<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed ITA 2771/BOM/85 (AY 1980-81) regarding provisions for guarantee liability, repairs, and professional fees. However, ITA 2772/BOM/85 (AY 1981-82) was partly allowed, with the application of sec. 40(c) upheld for director employees but disallowing set off of loss of the merged company. The revenue succeeded in challenging the allowance of provisions for repairs and the set off of the merged company&#039;s loss, while the assessee prevailed on the treatment of professional fees as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:49:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed ITA 2771/BOM/85 (AY 1980-81) regarding provisions for guarantee liability, repairs, and professional fees. However, ITA 2772/BOM/85 (AY 1981-82) was partly allowed, with the application of sec. 40(c) upheld for director employees but disallowing set off of loss of the merged company. The revenue succeeded in challenging the allowance of provisions for repairs and the set off of the merged company&#039;s loss, while the assessee prevailed on the treatment of professional fees as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>