<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58593</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the added interest amount of Rs. 2,41,955. The Tribunal accepted the waiver of interest based on a resolution by the Board of Directors before the accounting year, citing financial distress of debtor parties and the absence of recovery. The decision emphasized that the interest could not be deemed accrued, following the Supreme Court precedent, and rejected the Income-tax Officer&#039;s inclusion of interest in the total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 98 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58593</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the added interest amount of Rs. 2,41,955. The Tribunal accepted the waiver of interest based on a resolution by the Board of Directors before the accounting year, citing financial distress of debtor parties and the absence of recovery. The decision emphasized that the interest could not be deemed accrued, following the Supreme Court precedent, and rejected the Income-tax Officer&#039;s inclusion of interest in the total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>