<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 69 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, directing the exclusion of the amounts paid by the individual for the HUF&#039;s tax liability from the assessment of wealth tax for the relevant years. The Tribunal held that if the property ceased to exist with either the individual or the HUF, its value cannot be included in the wealth, emphasizing valuation is only possible for existing assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 69 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals, directing the exclusion of the amounts paid by the individual for the HUF&#039;s tax liability from the assessment of wealth tax for the relevant years. The Tribunal held that if the property ceased to exist with either the individual or the HUF, its value cannot be included in the wealth, emphasizing valuation is only possible for existing assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>