<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58573</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the valuation of closing stock and excise duty inclusion. It found the assessee&#039;s method of valuation to be consistent and in line with accounting principles. The additions to the income made by the IAC were deemed unjustified, leading to their deletion for the respective assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58573</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the valuation of closing stock and excise duty inclusion. It found the assessee&#039;s method of valuation to be consistent and in line with accounting principles. The additions to the income made by the IAC were deemed unjustified, leading to their deletion for the respective assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>