<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 100 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of sales promotion expenses as entertainment expenses but allowed the deduction of selling expenses as business expenditure. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the investment allowance for the synthetic resin plant, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement under Section 32A. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=97029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 100 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of sales promotion expenses as entertainment expenses but allowed the deduction of selling expenses as business expenditure. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the investment allowance for the synthetic resin plant, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement under Section 32A. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>