<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 45 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that advance tax paid should not be deducted from the provision for taxation in the balance sheet for the purpose of computing the market value of unquoted equity shares. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the provision for taxation should be the full amount shown in the balance sheet without adjusting for advance tax paid, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 45 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that advance tax paid should not be deducted from the provision for taxation in the balance sheet for the purpose of computing the market value of unquoted equity shares. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the provision for taxation should be the full amount shown in the balance sheet without adjusting for advance tax paid, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>