<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 72 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment due to non-compliance with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, holding it as an irregularity rather than a nullity. It directed the Income-tax Officer to pass a fresh order after following the mandatory provisions, emphasizing that procedural defects in fiscal matters require rectification without rendering the proceedings null. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal requirements in assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 72 - ITAT BOMBAY-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment due to non-compliance with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, holding it as an irregularity rather than a nullity. It directed the Income-tax Officer to pass a fresh order after following the mandatory provisions, emphasizing that procedural defects in fiscal matters require rectification without rendering the proceedings null. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal requirements in assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>