<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 151 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58522</link>
    <description>A non-resident bank&#039;s interest on sterling securities kept with the RBI was treated as taxable Indian income because the securities were required for the banking business and the interest was attributable to the Indian permanent establishment. The treaty position on attribution and reasonable head office expense allocation prevailed over the domestic restriction in section 44C, while related interest deduction required proportionate computation. Payments to charitable trusts were not fully allowable as business expenditure absent proof of business nexus. Disallowances under sections 40A(5) and 37(2A) were deleted, but the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) was held not appealable on merits. The car-loss computation was remanded for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 151 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58522</link>
      <description>A non-resident bank&#039;s interest on sterling securities kept with the RBI was treated as taxable Indian income because the securities were required for the banking business and the interest was attributable to the Indian permanent establishment. The treaty position on attribution and reasonable head office expense allocation prevailed over the domestic restriction in section 44C, while related interest deduction required proportionate computation. Payments to charitable trusts were not fully allowable as business expenditure absent proof of business nexus. Disallowances under sections 40A(5) and 37(2A) were deleted, but the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) was held not appealable on merits. The car-loss computation was remanded for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>