<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 89 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to credit for only 50% of the tax deducted at source by the Nigerian company, in line with the judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and Rajasthan High Court. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 89 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to credit for only 50% of the tax deducted at source by the Nigerian company, in line with the judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and Rajasthan High Court. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>