<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 80 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed that the land was agricultural, the transaction was an investment rather than a trade adventure, and the surplus amount from the sale was not taxable. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, upholding the decision that the land was not a capital asset, the transaction was not a trade venture, and the surplus was not subject to taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 80 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed that the land was agricultural, the transaction was an investment rather than a trade adventure, and the surplus amount from the sale was not taxable. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, upholding the decision that the land was not a capital asset, the transaction was not a trade venture, and the surplus was not subject to taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>