<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58492</link>
    <description>Donations received under the trust deed were treated as accretions to corpus because the deed itself directed that such receipts be held on the same trust with the same powers and provisions. The trustees in fact retained the amounts as corpus and not as revenue income. On that basis, the receipts qualified for exemption under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disputed addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 90 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58492</link>
      <description>Donations received under the trust deed were treated as accretions to corpus because the deed itself directed that such receipts be held on the same trust with the same powers and provisions. The trustees in fact retained the amounts as corpus and not as revenue income. On that basis, the receipts qualified for exemption under section 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disputed addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>