<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 93 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58478</link>
    <description>Section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act was held applicable to office premises used for commercial purposes, as the relevant CBDT circular clarified that the exemption was not confined to a residential house or part of a house. The Tribunal treated the circular as binding on departmental authorities, so the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption in respect of the office premises was accepted and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 93 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58478</link>
      <description>Section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act was held applicable to office premises used for commercial purposes, as the relevant CBDT circular clarified that the exemption was not confined to a residential house or part of a house. The Tribunal treated the circular as binding on departmental authorities, so the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption in respect of the office premises was accepted and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>