<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (Appeals) decisions on all grounds, including the inapplicability of Section 52(2) of the IT Act for capital gains, rejection of profit determination based on hypothetical market value under Section 41(2), and the treatment of medical expenses reimbursement and retirement gratuity under Sections 40A(5) and 10(10) respectively. The Tribunal also noted the assistance of counsels for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (Appeals) decisions on all grounds, including the inapplicability of Section 52(2) of the IT Act for capital gains, rejection of profit determination based on hypothetical market value under Section 41(2), and the treatment of medical expenses reimbursement and retirement gratuity under Sections 40A(5) and 10(10) respectively. The Tribunal also noted the assistance of counsels for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>