<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58435</link>
    <description>The ITAT BOMBAY-B held that Section 40A(8) of the IT Act did not apply to interest paid on current accounts of directors and family members as it aimed to deter public borrowing, not personal transactions. The Tribunal found that the nature of deposits from the public differed from current account transactions, ruling the disallowance of interest unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58435</link>
      <description>The ITAT BOMBAY-B held that Section 40A(8) of the IT Act did not apply to interest paid on current accounts of directors and family members as it aimed to deter public borrowing, not personal transactions. The Tribunal found that the nature of deposits from the public differed from current account transactions, ruling the disallowance of interest unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>