<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58417</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty amount imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1969-70. The tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s conduct in rectifying the accounts as a mitigating factor and acknowledged the cooperation shown. While upholding the imposition of a penalty due to initial discrepancies in the accounts, the tribunal reduced the penalty considering the mitigating circumstances presented by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58417</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty amount imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1969-70. The tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s conduct in rectifying the accounts as a mitigating factor and acknowledged the cooperation shown. While upholding the imposition of a penalty due to initial discrepancies in the accounts, the tribunal reduced the penalty considering the mitigating circumstances presented by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>