<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by restoring the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order disallowing excess bonus under section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the applicability of section 40(c) for director remuneration, and remanding the issue of interest under section 214 back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration on the legality of maintaining an appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 92 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by restoring the Income Tax Officer&#039;s order disallowing excess bonus under section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the applicability of section 40(c) for director remuneration, and remanding the issue of interest under section 214 back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration on the legality of maintaining an appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>