<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 117 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, holding that disallowance under Section 40A(3) is applicable even when net profit is estimated under Section 145. The assessee failed to establish the necessity for cash payments under Rule 6DD(j) and the CBDT circular. The Tribunal directed adjustments to avoid double disallowance, reducing the disallowance under Section 40A(3) by the amount of net profit addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 117 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, holding that disallowance under Section 40A(3) is applicable even when net profit is estimated under Section 145. The assessee failed to establish the necessity for cash payments under Rule 6DD(j) and the CBDT circular. The Tribunal directed adjustments to avoid double disallowance, reducing the disallowance under Section 40A(3) by the amount of net profit addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>