<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 79 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58377</link>
    <description>A loan liability treated as deemed dividend under the Income-tax Act remained a debt owed on the valuation date for wealth-tax purposes, because deductibility under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act depends only on whether the liability falls within the statutory exclusions. As the amount was an existing debt and did not come within sub-clauses (i) to (iii), it was deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:03:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 79 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58377</link>
      <description>A loan liability treated as deemed dividend under the Income-tax Act remained a debt owed on the valuation date for wealth-tax purposes, because deductibility under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act depends only on whether the liability falls within the statutory exclusions. As the amount was an existing debt and did not come within sub-clauses (i) to (iii), it was deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>