<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, sustaining the penalty imposed by the ITO under section 273(c) of the Income-tax Act for non-compliance with advance tax provisions. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, clarifying the application of advance tax provisions, the maintainability of appeals under different sections, and the distinction between timely and belated estimates under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=96826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 103 - ITAT BOMBAY-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, sustaining the penalty imposed by the ITO under section 273(c) of the Income-tax Act for non-compliance with advance tax provisions. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed, clarifying the application of advance tax provisions, the maintainability of appeals under different sections, and the distinction between timely and belated estimates under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=58368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>